<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Austin Matzko&#039;s Forum &#187; Topic: No &#34;save to server&#34; option for scheduled backup</title>
		<link>http://austinmatzko.com/forum/topic/no-save-to-server-option-for-scheduled-backup</link>
		<description>Austin Matzko&#039;s Forum &raquo; Topic: No &quot;save to server&quot; option for scheduled backup</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://austinmatzko.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://austinmatzko.com/forum/rss/topic/no-save-to-server-option-for-scheduled-backup" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>filosofo on "No &#34;save to server&#34; option for scheduled backup"</title>
			<link>http://austinmatzko.com/forum/topic/no-save-to-server-option-for-scheduled-backup#post-3890</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>filosofo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3890@http://austinmatzko.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Here's an example of people getting worked up about backups saved to the server and saying my plugin has security problems: &#60;a href=&#34;http://wordpress.org/support/topic/200372&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://wordpress.org/support/topic/200372&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I agree with you in principle that more choice is better, but in practice I choose to err on the side of caution.  &#60;em&#62;You&#60;/em&#62; wouldn't screw it up, but dozens of other people would.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;On the positive side of things, it wouldn't be hard to write a plugin that complements this plugin by doing what you want.  I just don't have the time at the moment to do so.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sylaan on "No &#34;save to server&#34; option for scheduled backup"</title>
			<link>http://austinmatzko.com/forum/topic/no-save-to-server-option-for-scheduled-backup#post-3889</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sylaan</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3889@http://austinmatzko.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I fail to see how it is your fault when you give people a choice. I am not saying replace the scheduled email with the scheduled server. Just offer them both as a choice.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Besides, you do offer &#34;Save to server&#34; when you do a one-time backup. How is that any different ?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the work you're done with the plugin. I just don't see what's wrong with more choice.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>filosofo on "No &#34;save to server&#34; option for scheduled backup"</title>
			<link>http://austinmatzko.com/forum/topic/no-save-to-server-option-for-scheduled-backup#post-3888</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>filosofo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3888@http://austinmatzko.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;No, sorry.  I think saving the backup to the server is a bad idea, so I'm not going to help people do it.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The main thing is that people who leave their backups on the server &#60;em&#62;and&#60;/em&#62; have mis-configured servers end up exposing their private data to the world, and consequently my plugin gets the blame.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Another is that it would be too easy to fill up a shared hosting's allotted disk space with automatic backups.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Finally, the point of the backups is redundancy in case of failure; if the backups are kept on the same machine as the database (a common scenario) it defeats the purpose.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sylaan on "No &#34;save to server&#34; option for scheduled backup"</title>
			<link>http://austinmatzko.com/forum/topic/no-save-to-server-option-for-scheduled-backup#post-3885</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sylaan</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3885@http://austinmatzko.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hello, &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Any reason I don't have a &#34;save to server&#34; option for scheduled backups ? I would like to have my NAS periodically retrieve the backup from the server, but currently that is not possible. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Any chance that this is implemented ?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Regards,&#60;br /&#62;
Stefan
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
