<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia Takes Off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austinmatzko.com/2005/09/10/wikipedia-takes-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austinmatzko.com/2005/09/10/wikipedia-takes-off/</link>
	<description>A blog about philosophy, Christianity, web development and whatever else I feel like writing about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:02:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2-RC4-18391</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Il Filosofo &#187; Wikipedia Fares Well Against Britannica</title>
		<link>http://austinmatzko.com/2005/09/10/wikipedia-takes-off/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Il Filosofo &#187; Wikipedia Fares Well Against Britannica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilfilosofo.com/blog/?p=108#comment-301</guid>
		<description>[...] However, I stand by my earlier assertion that Wikipedia can&#8217;t provide the depth of knowledge of something like the Encyclopedia Britannica. Getting facts right is one thing, but I doubt it&#8217;s capable of providing the analysis that a professional can bring. Someone should do a similar study comparing articles about the humanities; in that case a good article would require more than just lists of facts.   Tags: Encyclopedia Britannica, Internet, Wikipedia [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, I stand by my earlier assertion that Wikipedia can&#8217;t provide the depth of knowledge of something like the Encyclopedia Britannica. Getting facts right is one thing, but I doubt it&#8217;s capable of providing the analysis that a professional can bring. Someone should do a similar study comparing articles about the humanities; in that case a good article would require more than just lists of facts.   Tags: Encyclopedia Britannica, Internet, Wikipedia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JRC</title>
		<link>http://austinmatzko.com/2005/09/10/wikipedia-takes-off/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>JRC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 01:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilfilosofo.com/blog/?p=108#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts. Wikipedia is definitely gaining stature in the public eye, but I think I stand about where you do on the trust you put in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts. Wikipedia is definitely gaining stature in the public eye, but I think I stand about where you do on the trust you put in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
